¶ … Ashcroft US Supreme Court case Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition

In the case of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, the Supreme Court presented even more arguments and reasons as to why online child pornography is prohibited. What this case failed to do is define how far the government's censorship can stretch. The controversial question lies in the phrasing from the COPA provisions where terms referring to virtual child pornography were struck out for being too broad (Mota 2002).

This case has proven among the more interesting regarding first amendment rights on the internet. Unlike most rulings by the Supreme Court where the majority of states agree on the ruling, this case came down with most districts agreeing instead with the dissent. Many arguments have now been presented as to why even virtual child pornography is an issue. Namely, the idea that producing child pornography can lead to pedophile behaviors (Mirkin, 2009). Additional arguments include the idea that arrested...

Overall, the arguments are logical, but thus far have not proven persuasive enough to the court.
Those in agreement with the ruling have one simple and yet very compelling argument. Simply stated, the first amendment is sacred to this country, so if Congress wants to limit this right it must be done with very specific drafting (Mota 2002). This is exactly the point and the one thing that congress has still failed to acknowledge.

Hudson, David (2004). Enforcing Morality. ABA Journal, 90, 14-16.

Mirkin, Harris (2009). The Social, Political, and Legal Construction of the Concept of Child Pornography. Journal of Homosexuality, 56(2), 233-267.

Mota, Sue (2002). The U.S. Supreme Court Addresses the Child Pornography Prevention Act and Child Online Protection Act in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition and Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union. Federal…